Skailar Hage
skailar-hage
Product
-
February 26, 2026

Architecting AI Trust: The Role of Sensitive Data Scanning

7 min read

Bigeye’s AI Trust Platform now includes Sensitive Data Scanning, continuously mapping, protecting, and controlling AI agent access to regulated data across your estate.

Skailar Hage
Get Data Insights Delivered
Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.
Stay Informed
Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.
Get the Best of Data Leadership
Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Get the Best of Data Leadership

Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Stay Informed

Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.

Get Data Insights Delivered

Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.

For years, enterprise data governance was designed for people.

Access happened through defined workflows. Queries came from known users. Policies were applied at the system level. Controls reflected predictable patterns of use.

That model assumed data access was deliberate and human-driven.

AI changes that.

Agents do not access data the way people do. They operate continuously, querying multiple systems at once. They move across operational databases and warehouses in seconds. They combine datasets dynamically. Once deployed, they act at machine speed.

As enterprises connect multiple AI platforms to multiple data sources, the surface area of data access expands rapidly.

Data that was once accessed by a small group of analysts can now influence automated decisions and agent responses. Regulated fields can propagate across domains before teams realize it. Sensitive data no longer stays confined to a source system; it becomes part of AI-enabled workflows.

Enterprises are being asked to scale AI responsibly without always knowing what data their AI systems are using, whether that data is reliable, or whether it should be accessed at all. Solving that problem requires more than monitoring pipelines. It requires visibility into data access, and the means to control that access. 

The Bigeye AI Trust Platform

The Bigeye AI Trust Platform brings data reliability, sensitivity, governance, and AI access into one system. Built as a layered architecture, it does not treat these capabilities as separate tools, but connects them so the status of your data directly informs how AI is allowed to use it.

At the foundation is Metadata Management, a continuously updated map of the enterprise data estate. It catalogs schemas, tables, columns, jobs, reports, and domains across modern and legacy systems. It profiles datasets, assigns ownership, enables tagging of critical data elements, and provides unified search across the stack.

This is supported by end-to-end, column-level lineage. Lineage shows where data originates, how it is transformed, and where it flows across warehouses, ETL jobs, BI tools, and downstream systems. That context makes it possible to understand not just what data exists, but how it is being used.

On top of that foundation sit three domains: data observability, data sensitivity and data governance. 

Data Observability monitors reliability. It adapts as new tables, columns, and pipelines appear. It detects anomalies in freshness, volume, distribution, and other indicators of health. Alerts are lineage-aware, showing where issues started and what downstream assets are affected.

In AI environments, this matters because agents can continue operating while quietly consuming degraded data. Reliability must be measured continuously, not assumed.

Data Governance defines accountability. Ownership can be assigned at the schema, table, or column level. Domains organize assets by team or function. Certification clarifies which datasets are approved for specific uses. Because governance is connected to lineage and monitoring, policies reflect how data actually behaves across systems.

Data Sensitivity identifies regulated and high-impact data classes across structured sources. It continuously evaluates for PII, PHI, PCI, PFI, and other sensitive categories using pre-built and configurable classifiers backed by AI-assisted detection. Incremental and ongoing scans evaluate new and modified data so coverage keeps pace with change while controlling cost.

These domains work together to supply the signals that inform AI behavior.

Above them sits AI Governance, implemented by Bigeye’s AI Guardian and supported by the AI Data Gateway and Policy Engine. AI systems access enterprise data through a governed control point rather than unmanaged connections. At that control point, reliability, sensitivity, and certification status are evaluated before data is used.

AI Guardian is the runtime enforcement layer for this architecture. When an AI system issues a request, Guardian evaluates it against trust signals from Data Observability, Data Sensitivity, and Data Governance before returning results. That evaluation can run in monitoring mode for visibility, in advising mode to guide agents toward better datasets, or in strict steering mode where non-compliant access is blocked.

The Role of Sensitive Data Scanning

Within the AI Trust Platform, Sensitive Data Scanning is the piece that turns knowledge of sensitive data into the signals AI Governance uses to enforce control.

The platform-level Data Sensitivity capabilities describe how regulated fields are discovered, classified, and tied to lineage and catalog context. Sensitive Data Scanning takes that foundation and makes it usable in real time by the teams and systems that need it most.

The shift is simple but important: sensitive data is no longer just documented. It becomes part of how decisions are made.

In traditional environments, discovery results lived in static reports and spreadsheets. They were useful for audits and one-off reviews, but they rarely stayed in sync with how data moved through pipelines or how it was reused by different teams. By the time an issue surfaced, the underlying exposure was often weeks or months old.

In an AI-driven estate, that model breaks down quickly.

Agents and AI applications inherit whatever is happening in the data estate. If sensitive fields drift into new tables, domains, or aggregates, agents will follow. Without live sensitivity context, requests can look harmless on the surface while pulling in regulated information behind the scenes.

Sensitive Data Scanning closes that gap by keeping sensitivity attached to the data as it moves and making those classifications available at the moment of access.

When schemas change, classifications update with them. When sensitive data appears in an unexpected downstream system, lineage shows where it originated, how it moved through the stack, and which downstream assets are affected. When a dataset feeds an AI workflow, its sensitivity status is already known and available to the controls sitting in front of it.

That is where enforcement comes in.

Sensitive Data Scanning feeds these signals into AI Governance through Bigeye’s AI Guardian layer. When an AI system requests data, Guardian can see which fields are sensitive, what class they fall into, and how they should be handled under current policy. Depending on those rules, access can proceed, be redirected to safer datasets, or be blocked outright.

If a dataset that was previously safe begins to include regulated fields, its sensitivity status changes how AI is allowed to use it. If sensitive data shows up in a domain where it does not belong, teams have both the context to investigate and the ability to prevent agents from touching it. The same signals that support audits and privacy workflows also drive real-time decisions about AI access.

Sensitive Data Scanning, in this role, is not just about finding sensitive data. It supplies the live sensitivity signals that allow governance, security, and AI teams to move from knowing where regulated data is, to controlling how it is used.

What This Enables

For CISOs and their teams, this means sensitive data is no longer a static inventory. It is a continuously updated view of where regulated information lives, how it moves, and which systems are exposed. Audit preparation becomes a matter of showing evidence, not rebuilding it from scratch.

For Chief AI Officers and AI platform leaders, it answers a question that increasingly decides whether AI projects move forward: are our agents touching data they shouldn’t? As AI initiatives grow, leaders can see which datasets agents are drawing from, whether those datasets contain sensitive fields, and how that exposure is being handled.

Both roles gain confidence that AI systems are operating on data that is reliable, appropriate, and visible.

Now Available

While AI adoption accelerates, responsible access to enterprise data cannot rely on periodic review. It requires a system that keeps reliability, sensitivity, and governance aligned in real time. With this release, enterprises can move beyond static tools to a continuous view of sensitive data tied directly to lineage, observability, and AI governance. 

Sensitive Data Scanning brings that capability into the AI Trust Platform.

Sensitive Data Scanning is now available in its initial release within the Bigeye AI Trust Platform. Existing Bigeye customers can contact their Customer Success Engineer to add it to their deployment. If you’re evaluating how to control sensitive data in AI workflows, request a demo to see how the platform works end to end.

share this episode
Resource
Monthly cost ($)
Number of resources
Time (months)
Total cost ($)
Software/Data engineer
$15,000
3
12
$540,000
Data analyst
$12,000
2
6
$144,000
Business analyst
$10,000
1
3
$30,000
Data/product manager
$20,000
2
6
$240,000
Total cost
$954,000
Role
Goals
Common needs
Data engineers
Overall data flow. Data is fresh and operating at full volume. Jobs are always running, so data outages don't impact downstream systems.
Freshness + volume
Monitoring
Schema change detection
Lineage monitoring
Data scientists
Specific datasets in great detail. Looking for outliers, duplication, and other—sometimes subtle—issues that could affect their analysis or machine learning models.
Freshness monitoringCompleteness monitoringDuplicate detectionOutlier detectionDistribution shift detectionDimensional slicing and dicing
Analytics engineers
Rapidly testing the changes they’re making within the data model. Move fast and not break things—without spending hours writing tons of pipeline tests.
Lineage monitoringETL blue/green testing
Business intelligence analysts
The business impact of data. Understand where they should spend their time digging in, and when they have a red herring caused by a data pipeline problem.
Integration with analytics toolsAnomaly detectionCustom business metricsDimensional slicing and dicing
Other stakeholders
Data reliability. Customers and stakeholders don’t want data issues to bog them down, delay deadlines, or provide inaccurate information.
Integration with analytics toolsReporting and insights
about the author

Skailar Hage

Product Marketing Manager

Skailar Hage works at the intersection of product and customer research. As Product Marketing Manager, he collaborates closely with product and customer teams to research how the Bigeye platform is used, gather customer feedback, and translate technical ideas into simplified messages. His work focuses on understanding the product deeply and supporting thoughtful, well-informed product decisions. With 4+ years of experience in the AI, data, and analytics space, he helps Bigeye bring robust solutions to real problems within the market.

about the author

Adrianna Vidal

Adrianna Vidal is a writer and content strategist at Bigeye, where she explores how organizations navigate the practical challenges of scaling AI responsibly. With over 10 years of experience in communications, she focuses on translating complex AI governance and data infrastructure challenges into actionable insights for data and AI leaders.

At Bigeye, her work centers on AI trust: examining how organizations build the governance frameworks, data quality foundations, and oversight mechanisms that enable reliable AI at enterprise scale.

Her interest in data privacy and digital rights informs her perspective on building AI systems that organizations, and the people they serve, can actually trust.

about the author

Skailar Hage works at the intersection of product and customer research. As Product Marketing Manager, he collaborates closely with product and customer teams to research how the Bigeye platform is used, gather customer feedback, and translate technical ideas into simplified messages. His work focuses on understanding the product deeply and supporting thoughtful, well-informed product decisions. With 4+ years of experience in the AI, data, and analytics space, he helps Bigeye bring robust solutions to real problems within the market.

Get the Best of Data Leadership

Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Stay Informed

Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.

Get Data Insights Delivered

Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.

Join the Bigeye Newsletter

1x per month. Get the latest in data observability right in your inbox.