Thought leadership
-
September 24, 2025

How to Overcome AI Fear in Your Organization

6 min read

TL;DR Four enterprise leaders share their approaches to overcoming AI anxiety: start with internal pilots to remove customer risk, address specific fears with concrete mitigation plans, set transparent expectations about limitations, and leverage competitive pressure strategically.

Adrianna Vidal
Get Data Insights Delivered
Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.
Stay Informed
Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.
Get the Best of Data Leadership
Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Get the Best of Data Leadership

Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Stay Informed

Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.

Get Data Insights Delivered

Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.

AI anxiety is real. At Bigeye's recent No Bad Data Tour stop in Atlanta, an audience member captured what many face when integrating AI into their organizations:

"My leadership says we want to be an AI-driven company, but then when we show them a proof of concept, suddenly AI seems scary."

We asked our panel of AI leaders, who've successfully implemented AI at OneTrust, Georgia-Pacific, Deluxe, and Apptad, how they've navigated this challenge. Their approaches reveal that overcoming AI fear is all about one thing: strategic change management.

The real challenge behind AI adoption

Overcoming AI fear is fundamentally a change management challenge, not a technology challenge. Most AI implementations fail not because of technical limitations, but because organizations can't manage the human side of adoption. Fear, uncertainty, and resistance from leadership and teams derail projects before they reach production.

The common fears these leaders encountered

Customer risk and reputation damage: Executives worry about AI making mistakes that could harm customer relationships or damage the company's reputation. The fear of public AI failures (chatbots saying inappropriate things, agents making harmful decisions) creates anxiety about customer-facing implementations.

Regulatory compliance and legal exposure: With evolving AI regulations like the EU AI Act, leaders fear fines, legal challenges, and compliance violations. Executives understand that regulatory missteps could result in penalties based on percentage of overall revenue.

Cost overruns and unclear ROI: AI projects can spiral in cost, especially when organizations don't understand the true economics of implementation. Leaders worry about investing significant resources without clear returns or predictable budgets.

Competitive disadvantage from inaction: The flip side of implementation fear is the fear of falling behind. Executives recognize that while AI carries risks, not adopting it may put them at a competitive disadvantage as other companies gain operational efficiencies.

Unrealistic expectations and inevitable disappointment: Leaders fear promising too much and delivering too little, creating organizational skepticism that makes future AI initiatives harder to launch.

Build confidence through internal test cases

This internal-first approach works because it removes the customer risk factor that often triggers executive anxiety. When leadership sees AI solving real problems for their own teams, problems they understand intimately, the technology becomes less abstract and more practical.

Srinivas, former SVP at Deluxe, took what he calls a "client zero mentality" when rolling out AI initiatives. Instead of jumping straight to customer-facing applications, his team proved AI value internally first.

"We want to prove it on business functions like finance or marketing first," he explained. "We did discovery across the organization: what real friction or pain is there? How do we use that information, build something, and then test it."

The breakthrough case:

  • Problem: Accounts payable was taking two weeks to close books, with 10-15 people manually processing invoices
  • Solution: They built an AI solution to automate parts of this process, tested it internally, and demonstrated clear results
"We made sure we proved it internally with the AI. And then it gave us the confidence to roll it out in other places."

Address specific AI fears with concrete solutions

The key insight is that "AI seems scary" is rarely about the technology itself. It's about business risks that executives may not be able to fully articulate. By naming those fears explicitly and showing how you'll mitigate them, you transform vague anxiety into manageable business problems.

Kyle Kirwan, Chief Product Officer at Bigeye, suggests getting tactical about what's driving the fear.

"Show them the potential solutions to actual fears. What are the tangible things we're worried about: fines, reputation damage, security breaches?"

Examples of addressing specific fears:

  • Regulatory compliance: Show your governance framework and legal review process
  • Reputation risk: Demonstrate your testing protocols and rollback procedures
  • Cost overruns: Present your budget controls, projected savings, and success metrics

This approach shifts the conversation from "should we do AI?" to "how do we do AI safely?" That's a much more productive discussion.

Be transparent about AI goals and trade-offs

Arbind Singh, Co-founder of Apptad, emphasized the importance of setting clear expectations upfront.

"Be up front with the goals and potential outcomes. Managing culture within the company requires honest conversations about what AI will and won't accomplish."

This means acknowledging limitations alongside benefits. AI won't solve every problem instantly. It requires ongoing investment and iteration. Some use cases will fail. But when you're transparent about these realities, you build trust rather than setting up unrealistic expectations that lead to disappointment.

Arbind's approach involves mapping out the change management process explicitly. Who will be affected? What new skills will teams need to develop? How will success be measured? What happens if the pilot doesn't work as expected?

By addressing these questions proactively, you demonstrate that you've thought through the implications seriously rather than just chasing the latest technology trend.

Leverage competitive pressure strategically

Chase Hartline of OneTrust pointed to a powerful motivator that often overcomes fear: competitive disadvantage.

"Executives know that by not adopting AI use cases, it will be a competitive disadvantage. That will affect their bottom line."

You don't need to create artificial urgency or lean into fear-mongering. But it can be helpful for leadership to understand the opportunity cost of inaction. While your organization debates, competitors are rolling out their own pilots: gaining operational efficiencies, improving customer experiences, and reducing costs.

Chase's insight is that executive sponsorship often comes down to risk assessment: Is the risk of trying AI greater than the risk of not trying it? In many industries, that calculation is shifting rapidly.

The key is presenting this competitive context alongside your risk mitigation strategies. Show leadership that other companies in your industry are successfully implementing similar use cases. Demonstrate that you've learned from their experiences and built safeguards accordingly.

The pattern that works

Across all four approaches, a common pattern emerges: successful AI leaders don't try to eliminate fear entirely. Instead, they manage it productively.

They start with low-risk internal use cases that build organizational confidence. They address specific concerns with concrete solutions rather than generic reassurances. They set realistic expectations about outcomes and timelines. And they frame AI adoption as a strategic necessity rather than an optional experiment.

The goal is to prove that your organization can implement AI responsibly and effectively. Once you demonstrate that capability internally, expanding to more ambitious use cases becomes much easier.

Meet the AI experts

Bigeye's No Bad Data roadshow brings together enterprise leaders to discuss the practical challenges of implementing AI and data initiatives. Our Atlanta discussion featured expert speakers:

Srinivas Nagarajan brings 24 years of experience in product management and AI implementation, most recently serving as SVP at Deluxe, a major payments processing company.

Kyle Kirwan is Chief Product Officer at Bigeye, where he leads product strategy and works directly with enterprise customers implementing AI at scale.

Arbind Singh is Co-founder of Apptad, a consulting firm that has spent 12 years helping enterprises develop data strategies and align AI implementations with business objectives.

Chase Hartline leads product alliances and business development at OneTrust, bringing 15 years of experience in privacy, security, and compliance for enterprise AI initiatives.

share this episode
Resource
Monthly cost ($)
Number of resources
Time (months)
Total cost ($)
Software/Data engineer
$15,000
3
12
$540,000
Data analyst
$12,000
2
6
$144,000
Business analyst
$10,000
1
3
$30,000
Data/product manager
$20,000
2
6
$240,000
Total cost
$954,000
Role
Goals
Common needs
Data engineers
Overall data flow. Data is fresh and operating at full volume. Jobs are always running, so data outages don't impact downstream systems.
Freshness + volume
Monitoring
Schema change detection
Lineage monitoring
Data scientists
Specific datasets in great detail. Looking for outliers, duplication, and other—sometimes subtle—issues that could affect their analysis or machine learning models.
Freshness monitoringCompleteness monitoringDuplicate detectionOutlier detectionDistribution shift detectionDimensional slicing and dicing
Analytics engineers
Rapidly testing the changes they’re making within the data model. Move fast and not break things—without spending hours writing tons of pipeline tests.
Lineage monitoringETL blue/green testing
Business intelligence analysts
The business impact of data. Understand where they should spend their time digging in, and when they have a red herring caused by a data pipeline problem.
Integration with analytics toolsAnomaly detectionCustom business metricsDimensional slicing and dicing
Other stakeholders
Data reliability. Customers and stakeholders don’t want data issues to bog them down, delay deadlines, or provide inaccurate information.
Integration with analytics toolsReporting and insights

Get the Best of Data Leadership

Subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for exclusive content on data reliability, observability, and leadership from top industry experts.

Stay Informed

Sign up for the Data Leaders Digest and get the latest trends, insights, and strategies in data management delivered straight to your inbox.

Get Data Insights Delivered

Join hundreds of data professionals who subscribe to the Data Leaders Digest for actionable insights and expert advice.

Join the Bigeye Newsletter

1x per month. Get the latest in data observability right in your inbox.