Access the Best on the Web The Best Blogs on the Web Hurricane and Weather reports Telephone Directory Dictionary & Thesaurus Maps and Directions

Foreign Correspondent
by international syndicated columnist & broadcaster Eric Margolis


Copyright: Eric S. Margolis, 2005

December 5, 2005

I was once asked during a TV interview if my referring to Israelís Ariel Sharon as `generalí rather than prime minister was intended as a slur.

`Au contraire,í I replied. `Speaking as a former soldier, I respect generals far more than any politicians, including `prime ministers.í

This column has often and sharply criticized PM Sharonís Arab-bashing politics, and his bloody invasion of Lebanon, but has always admired him as one of our eraís most brilliant generals. Gen. Sharonís devastating counter-attack against advancing Egyptians in Sinai in 1973, and his dramatic crossing of the Suez Canal, will be enshrined in military history. A water crossing or amphibious landing in the face of the enemy is the second most perilous of all military operations.

Now, the 77-year old soldier has just mounted yet another brilliant and risky maneuver.

The most dangerous and difficult military operation is retreat under fire. This is exactly what Sharon has pulled off by ditching the far right Likud Party that he did so much to build, and starting his own more centrist party, Kadima.

Sharon had enough of Likudís fanatical religious extremists who bitterly opposed his sensible pullout of Israeli settlers and soldiers from Gaza. Even Sharonís plans to impose an unfavorable, unilateral territorial settlement on Palestinians were bitterly opposed by uber-Likudniks, and their leader-in-waiting, Bibi Netanyahu, who wonít give up their dream of biblical Greater Israel.

Polls show Sharonís Kadima is likely to take a majority of seats in March elections, leaving Likud in the dust.

Sharonís old friend, Shimon Peres, who plays `good copí to Sharoní `bad copí in dealing with the Arabs, is also decamping to Kadima after being ousted as veteran Labor Party leader by a young firebrand of Moroccan background, Amir Peretz. In a lurid example of Israelís chronic rivalry between European and Mideastern Jews, Peresí brother amusingly accused Labor of falling under control, of `North Africans.í

Sharon wasted no time after this dazzling maneuver to announce a settlement had to be achieved with Palestinians. Israel could not retain the entire West Bank and remain a democracy, Sharon admitted. He did not say it, but the only alternative is apartheid. However, Sharon made no mention of Syriaís strategic Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since 1967.

Israel, says Sharon, will keep all Jerusalem and major West Bank Jewish settlement blocks. His East German-style `security wall,í which has grabbed large slices of Arab land, will stay. Palestinians will be allowed a mini-state on whatís left of the truncated West Bank.

This plan is certain to be rejected by Palestinians. It would produce what they have long feared: three or four semi-isolated bantustans without Arab Jerusalem, surrounded by Israeli troops, chopped up by Jewish-only roads that is politically and economically unviable. In short, a giant prison camp for Palestinians.

Gen. Sharon wonít achieve lasting peace with this plan. Itís hard to be optimistic about anything in the Mideast, but I am hoping Sharon has a still hidden agenda to implement a viable Palestinian state, and upgrade Israelís downtrodden Arabs to first-class citizens, that will allow Israel and its neighbors to leave in peace. Otherwise, the 80-year Arab-Israeli conflict will drag on.

Sharon, that human tank, seems to be the only Israeli leader who can convince Israelis to accept a viable peace plan that trades land for security.

Just as the great Charles De Gaulle faced down violent settlers and freed Algeria from French colonial rule, so Gen. Sharon holds the fate of the Levant in his hands. Letís hope his heart can still bear the strain of his grossly overweight body and ferocious Israeli politics.

The time is ripe. Sharon and his US supporters ≠ I call them the American Likud Party(aka `neoconservativesí)- did much to engineer the US war against Iraq, thereby destroying one of Israelís prime enemies. So far, Israel, Iran and al-Qaida have been the only winners of the 2003 Iraq War. Israel has been able to lower defense spending and cut troops. Sharon, according to former US National Security Advisor Gen, Brent Scowcroft, `has Bush wrapped around his little finger.í

Gen Sharon controls all the high ground. Now is the time for him to win his last great battle by making genuine, lasting peace, and be remembered not only as Israelís finest general, but also its bringer of peace.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2005


  • Israelís former prime minister Bibi Netanyahu, who is poised to take the reins of the far right Likud Party, just announced that if he became prime minister again, he would attack and destroy Iranís nuclear plants. Iran president recently played into the hands of Israelís uber-hawks by proclaiming that Israel should be `wiped off the map.í Watch this issue to take center stage in Israelís spring elections.

  • Michael Ignatieff, much ballyhooed Harvard professor of human rights, has been parachuted into a safe Liberal Party riding in Toronto, Canada, as the partyís new golden boy in upcoming elections. Having debated or appeared on TV panels with Ignatieff, I find his being touted as a future Canadian prime minister revolting. As a so-called human rights expert, Ignatieff is a disgrace. He opposed stopping Serbian ethnic cleansing, denigrated Ukrainian independence, eagerly supported the trumped-up war against Iraq, and now defends torture of anti-American suspects. He appears always ready and willing to preach whatever party line will advance his career, and kiss the establishment hand that feeds him. We have enough like him in the lap dog media.

  • Where the money? Some $9 billion of US taxpayer money is missing from the so-called `rebuilding of Iraq.í Looks like itís been stolen. When this scandal breaks into the open, watch the White House run for cover.

  • The moronic thugs who kidnapped four Christian aid workers who were in Iraq trying to protect its people against the brutalities of the US-led occupation and Shia death squads have blighted the name of legitimate resistance forces. Just like the bloody-minded Abu Musab al-Zarqwai. Such criminals allow the Bush White House to claim the invasion of Iraq is all about fighting terrorism rather than grabbing its oil. Almost ignored is the fact that the kidnappers are demanding the release of all Iraqi prisoners held by the US and its local stooges. By latest estimates, this amount to 15,000 -20,000 political prisoners. More than Saddam Hussein held.

Published at since 1995 with permission, as a courtesy and in appreciation.

To read previous columns by Mr. Margolis: Click here

Bigeye Table of Contents and are supported by Florida Reverse Mortgages and by
The Careington Dental Plan with more than 5 million satisfied members - since 1979.