Access the Best on the Web
The Ron Paul Page
The cat with Ron Paul books
Click here for Ron Paul Flyers -- Master Copy

Turn off TV - click above
click for breaking news TraVerus Travel
Cheap tickets - lowest airfares
Dental Plans
Careington Dental
Top casinos online
Casino games
Help wanted

Foreign Correspondent
by international syndicated columnist & broadcaster Eric Margolis


October 22, 2007

NEW YORK- Just before departing for her dramatic return to Pakistan after years of self-imposed exile, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto told me of her joy at going home, and plans to rebuild democratic government in her nation.

Tragically, Benazirís triumphant homecoming turned into a bloodbath as an attempt to assassinate her in Karachi left nearly 150 dead and hundreds wounded. While the western media blamed Islamic radicals, Ms Bhutto was quickly to accuse unnamed elements within the armed forces and security establishment. She was, in effect, blaming Gen. Musharraf, the man with whom she is now expected to cooperate under a US-brokered power-sharing deal.

Meanwhile, Washington, and even the First Lady Laura Bush, have been blasting Burmaís military junta for brutal repression. At the same time, Pakistanís US-backed military junta, which receive $1 billion monthly in covert US payments, is waging war against its own restive people, thousands of whom have been killed by the armed forces. According to the Bush Administrationís thinking, shooting and beating rebellious Buddhist monks is evil; shooting and beating rebellious Muslim religious leaders is `anti-terrorism.í

I wished Benazir a bon voyage just before she left Dubai for her historic return home, and cautioned her that my extensive reader mail from Pakistan was running very much against her because of the deal she had made with military ruler Gen. Pervez Musharraf to allow her return. I reminded her of the old saying, `he who sups with the Devil had better use a very long spoon.í

The widespread view among Pakistanis is that Benazirís return and impending political power-sharing with Musharraf was engineered by Washington to add a veneer of legitimacy of democracy to his discredited military regime. Unless Bhutto can quickly and decisively distance herself from Musharraf and his Bush Administration sponsors, and show she is really in charge as prime minister, she and her cause may be gravely tarnished.

The US-arranged back-room deal between Bhutto and Musharraf also flies in the face of her claims to be restoring democracy to troubled Pakistan. He is dropping criminal charges for corruption against her Ė which the general insists are legitimate and she denies Ė in exchange for her cooperation with his military regime. There is no disguising that this is a tawdry deal worked out with two of Washingtonís staunchest Pakistani supporters.

As reported in my recent columns, the US has filled all senior positions in Pakistanís powerful military and intelligence service, ISI, with pro-American generals approved by the Pentagon and CIA. Even if Musharraf is ousted or blown up, the US believes it can retain firm control over Pakistan and use its armed forces to wage war there and in Afghanistan against nationalist and Islamist forces battling western influence.

The military rules Pakistan. Musharraf and his American patrons run Pakistanís military. So what is left for future prime minister Bhutto?

If Pakistanis conclude she is being cynically used, as it now appears, her political career could founder. If she can somehow push Musharraf and his generals back to their barracks, she will emerge triumphant. One suspects that Bhutto is hoping that Washington will abandon the highly unpopular Musharraf, ease him out of power, and make her the sole leader of Pakistan Ė with the US-dominated armed forces continuing to hold the real power behind the scenes.

Given the dizzying current political confusion between Musharraf, Bhutto, the Supreme Court, and exiled former PM Nawaz Sharif, itís impossible to predict what will happen next. But one thing is certain: recent polls show a majority of Pakistanis believe America under President George Bush has launched a war against Islam, and that Musharraf is Americaís agent in Islamabad. These disturbing beliefs could easily lead to increasing violence, even full-scale civil war.

Even if Musharraf and Bhutto eventually agree on some form of power-sharing, they will find themselves riding a tiger. Americaís 2001 invasion and subsequent occupation of Afghanistan, and Washingtonís ongoing efforts to control Pakistanís government, have ignited a spreading regional insurrection against western influence.

If the simmering civil war in nuclear-armed Pakistan blows into a wider conflict, the result will be an exceptionally dangerous world crisis in which nuclear-armed India could quickly become involved. The growing threat of a US attack on Iran will only deepen and spread the danger. An explosion in Pakistan would also isolate US and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Pakistanís most important national institution, the armed forces, has failed its duty to the nation. Instead of allowing itself to be rented like the sepoys in the mercenary armies of Britainís 19th century Imperial Indian Raj to wage war on its own people, Pakistanís military should be assuring its commanders serve the interest of the nation, rather than foreign powers. $1 billion a month rents a lot of cooperation, it is true. But Pakistanís once proud soldiers have sold their honor cheap.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2007.

Published at since 1995 with permission, as a courtesy and in appreciation.

To read previous columns by Mr. Margolis: Click here

Bigeye Table of Contents and are supported by Florida Reverse Mortgages and by
The Careington Dental Plan with more than 5 million satisfied members - since 1979.