Access the Best on the Web
USA history

and future
The Best Blogs on the Web

Turn off TV - click above
click for breaking news Travel Center
Cheap tickets - lowest airfares
Dental Plans
Careington Dental
Top casinos online
Casino games
Help wanted
Make this your Home-page.  or   Add it to your Bookmarks.

Foreign Correspondent
by international syndicated columnist & broadcaster Eric Margolis


February 19, 2007

North Koreaís `Dear Leader,í Kim Jong-il has long supported the desperately poor nation he inherited from his father by playing a game in which he truly excels, Pyongyang Bluff Poker.

Kim long ago learned that frightening his neighbors and the United States with nuclear weapons and truculent behavior was the best way to get food and cash aid from the rich nations. Though North Koreaís nuclear program was clearly designed for self-defense and thwarting an American attack, both the Clinton and Bush Administrations rose to bait and treated with the isolated Marxist state as if it was an existential threat to the United States.

As his economic woes mounted, Kim figured that staging a nuclear test would shake even more money out of the imperialist devils.

However, Kimís tiny nuclear explosion four months ago backfired badly. Japan, the leading potential target for North Koreaís potentially nuclear-armed medium range missiles, went absolutely ballistic. PM Shinzo Abeís new conservative government began openly talking about dropping Japanís traditional military and strategic timidity adopting a far more muscular stance. This would include the ability to strike at North Korea with missiles and strike aircraft, beefing up military forces, and erecting a multi-layer anti-missile shield.

China, which lost 10 million people fighting Japanís invasion of the 1930ís and 40ís, and never tires of beating the war drums over alleged `reborn Japanese militarism,í also got seriously angry at the `Dear Leaderí for provoking the Japanese.

Beijing fears Japan will one day use its huge economic strength to restore itself to a major military power that would challenge Chinaís growing might. China is concerned North Koreaís saber rattling might induce Japan to produce its own nuclear weapons Ė which it could do within three months. Some years ago, this writer obtained a copy of a diagram for a Japanese-nuclear device.

Beijing reacted with unprecedented anger and criticism to North Koreaís nuclear test, openly calling it reckless and dangerous. China is North Koreaís only ally, sole source of oil, and supplies much of its food. Soon after Kimís nuclear test, Beijing started squeezing North Korea by cutting back deliveries of oil and foodstuffs.

The inevitable ensued. North Korea was forced back to the negotiating table. Secret direct North Korean-US talks in Germany in January reached a tentative deal. Last week, the US, South Korea, Russia and Japan initialed a nuclear deal with North Korea in Beijing that is a significant diplomatic accomplishment, but one that must also be taken with an excess of caution.

North Korea is notorious for backing away from deals, and, claims the US, has violated numerous previous ones. The latest agreement, trumpeted by the Bush Administration as a great diplomatic victory, was really due to Chinaís intervention. Whether it holds up and advances, or Kim is just buying more time, remains to be seen.

This column has long predicted that North Korea would eventually be bribed to junk its nuclear program. The US was not prepared to go to war against North Korea which, unlike Iraq, could fight back. Bombing North Korea was not an option since South Koreaís capitol, Seoul, is within range of North Korean artillery and missile batteries dug in to the DMZ. So payoffs were the only logical recourse.

The latest deal mostly mirrors the one offered North Korea by the Clinton Administration in 1994 and denounced by Republican as a `sell-out.í The Clinton deal was scuppered by neocons in the Bush Administration who accused North Korea of secretly developing a Pakistani-supplied uranium enrichment program. The neoconís primary concern was not US national security but the fear that North Korea might sell nuclear warheads and delivery systems to Israelís Arab foes.

This time, however, North Korea will not get a light water power reactor promised under the Carter deal, but $400 million worth of oil. In return, North Korea agrees to seal its Yongbyon reactor.

But under the Beijing Accord, North Korea will still retain its nuclear weapons and delivery systems. The secret uranium enrichment operation the US claims North Korea has hidden away remains unresolved. This and many other contentious issues were left open for future discussions. They promise to be extremely difficult. At least the Bush Administration wisely opted to deal with North Korea in a step by step process of rewarding Pyongyang in well-defined stages for each concession it makes.

American neoconservatives are furious at President George Bush for what they claim is pandering to `axis of evilí North Korea in order to achieve a desperately needed foreign policy success after so many gross failures.

What really worries them, of course, is that direct talks with North Korea raise the obvious question: why not direct talks with Iran over its so far peaceful nuclear program? The neocons want war with Iran, not talks, so the example of North Korea is undermining their carefully developed strategy.

Meanwhile, back in North Korea, `Dear Leaderí Kim must be figuring out his next poker hand. He could always play his favorite hand. Which is to make a deal after torturous negotiations, agree to terms, then break the deal. Then later resume talks, using the final terms agreed to in the first negotiations as the starting point for achieving even better terms in the new talks.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2007.

Published at since 1995 with permission, as a courtesy and in appreciation.

To read previous columns by Mr. Margolis: Click here

Bigeye Table of Contents and are supported by Florida Reverse Mortgages and by
The Careington Dental Plan with more than 5 million satisfied members - since 1979.