
Photo Credit: Richard Drew, AP |
Falling Man
Cries Out For
Truth and Justice
by Allen L Roland
VeteransToday.com
September 4, 2011 |
Jonathan Briley was the falling man of 9/11 and one of 200
jumpers who leaped to their deaths on that infamous day in 2001. His image
captured by Richard Drew continues to shock and it demands the truth and justice
for those who perpetrated or allowed this treasonous false flag operation and
carefully orchestrated cover up to occur.
The most despicable act of American treason was the 9/11 false flag operation and
carefully orchestrated cover up which continues to this day.
The Obama administration is determined to keep this bamboozle covered up and
is, as such, complicit in hiding the truth of 9/11.
But nothing captures the sheer horror of that day more graphically than
Richard Drew’s photo of the falling man ~ later identified as Jonathan
Briley.
It was Carl Sagan who wrote ~ ” One of the saddest lessons of history is
this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of
the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The
bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge ~ even to
ourselves ~ that we’ve been so credulous. So the old bamboozles tend to
persist as the new bamboozles rise.”
The 9/11 cover up is America’s greatest bamboozle and many Americans are
apparently no longer interested in finding the truth ~ for it would indeed be
too painful to acknowledge.
But here are some facts to ponder on the 10th anniversary of
9/11 ~
- The 9/11 Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners
knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the
Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for
such false statements .
- 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for
a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail,
that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate
should continue “
- 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely
frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
- 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating:
“It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now
compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full
story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House
wants to cover it up”
- 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons
to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our
version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .” He also said that
the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al Qaeda detainees
who were physically coerced into talking.
- And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who
led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said “At some level of the
government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth
about what happened”. He also said “I was shocked at how different
the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….
This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a
culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made
at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed.
The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself,
to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way
things happened“
If even the 9/11 Commissioners don’t buy the official story, why do
you?
Senior intelligence officers:
- Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said
that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is “far more
explosive than the Pentagon Papers“. He also said that the
government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And
he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are
credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they
[U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there
might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or
psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that
there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting”
investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath
(see this and this)
- A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and
personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and
George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern)
said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a
joke”
- A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO)
and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis
(William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence
that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the
9/11 Commission would have us believe (and see this)
- A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who
co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts
among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a
joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious
shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission
Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were
ignored)
- A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative
reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in
the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the
Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that
“the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside
job .
- The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as
Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International
Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said
“The final 9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a
coverup”
If even our country’s top intelligence officers don’t buy the
official story, why do you?
Congressmen:
- According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and
former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant
had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the
Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then
hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official
stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White
House (confirmed here)
- Current Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy said “The two questions
that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s
watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they
allow it to happen?”
- Current Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation
and states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so
far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went
on”
- Current Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren’t
being told the truth about 9/11
- Current Republican Congressman Jason Chafetz says that we need to be
vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11
- Former Democratic Senator Mike Gravel states that he supports a new 9/11
investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11
- Former Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11
investigation
- Former U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg doesn’t believe the
official version of events
- Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed
Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military
Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the
U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about
explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an
inside job
If there is bipartisan questioning of the official story, why aren’t
you questioning it?
Other government officials:
- U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme
Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and
Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the
investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the
intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve
seen that for a long time”
- Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford,
and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task
Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign
Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals
and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into
9/11
- Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S.
Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former
U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media
commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says “The
information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so
extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a
defense of incompetence“
- The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government
Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to
unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up
instead of accepting responsibility
- Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col.
Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t
hunt”
- The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by
the 9/11 Commission
If top government officials are skeptical, why aren’t
you?
Numerous other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also
question at least some aspects of the government’s version of 9/11.
David Ray Griffin, perhaps the leading scholar in the 9/11 Truth movement,
made a plausible case in July in a 183-footnote open letter for the view that
“Among scientists and professionals in the relevant fields who
have studied the evidence, the weight of scientific and professional opinion is
now overwhelmingly on the side of the 9/11 Truth Movement.”
A new 15-minute documentary narrated by actor Ed Asner features many
9/11Truth experts, including structural engineers, chemical engineers, material
scientists, physicists, building demolition experts, firemen and others.
Every abuse of power by the Cheney/Bush administration can be traced to the
9/11 false flag operation and cover up and we, as a nation, will not be free
until we fully investigate, uncover the evidence and prosecute the perpetuators
of America’s greatest bamboozle ~ no matter how difficult it may be to
acknowledge this evil deed.
It was Schopenhauer who wrote ~ “The truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed ~ Second, it is violently opposed and Third, it is
accepted as being self-evident.”
Ten years has elapsed since the events of September 11, 2001. There has been
no hard evidence linking the claims made by the 9/11 Commission to their
conclusions. Even the 9/11 Commission admits they have been lied to
and “Set up to fail”.
It is now self-evident that a missile hit the
Pentagon; it is now self-evident that all three trade towers were brought down
by controlled demolitions and it is now self-evident that Jonathan Briley and
the thousands of others who died on 9/11 will not rest until the full extent of
the 9/11 false flag operation and cover up becomes self-evident and that the
true perpetrators and enablers are brought to justice.
In that regard, the recent self-serving, deceptive and revisionist history
books by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney should be reminders to all Americans
that the first casualty of war, and in particular illegal pre-emptive wars based
on lies, is the truth. * END *
US television networks and mainline newspapers censor information damaging to profits of large corporations as well as facts and statements that pertain to the events of 911. The internet has also been deeply infiltrated since 911. Huge sums are being spent by the same criminals resposible for the lies of 911 to place propaganda and disinformation online.
The first step is to inform yourself of facts and to share with others accurate information when discussing this country's current economic and political crisis. For now at least, the internet continues to carry uncensored news from courageous reporters and uncensored analyses and views expressed by responsible journalists. We encourage concerned persons who have internet access to bookmark: VeteransToday.com --- BigEye.com --- WhatReallyHappened.com
For the WHO of 911 -- http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/
For the WHY of 911 -- http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/motives.html
This page has been designed to be printed and distributed. Staple and make one mid-horizontal fold.