There have been several theories on the flights and events of 911, some more
plausible than others, beginning with Carol Valentine's brilliant 2002
Flight
of the Bumble Planes. The present updated analysis acknowledges our debts
to Ms Valentine and to Phil Jayhan of Let's Roll Forums for his
original work. The following explanation was updated slightly on 12-2-11.
Although we may not have the exact explanation, we feel that we are getting very
close to the truth of how this hoax was perpetrated.
The perpetrators of 911 used the events to kill potential whistle-blowers
whom they had involved in highly classified preparation of four entities
including one
Granit-type missile (Pentagon), one smaller missile or remotely controlled plane
(1st tower impact), one explosive-laden drone passenger-type aircraft (2nd
tower impact), and one passenger airliner that was rigged to be violently exploded by
remote command (Shanksville). Engineers and scientists of
Raytheon,
and others who worked on these projects were required to attend a west-coast meeting.
They were booked on the flights of 911 and shared the fate of that day's other innocent
passengers.
The day began with passengers and crew having been scheduled on Boston's AA-11 for takeoff at
0800, a flight that never was. Instead, they boarded UA-175 with its previous small load
(56 passengers, 9 crew) and took off at 0814. It landed at Stewart AFB where phony hijack
cell-phone calls were made. It took-off from there, flew westward and landed in Cleveland following that airport's lock-down. This plane's
transponder was changed to Delta-89 or to
United 1898, flight numbers masked by war games being conducted that day.
Also starting the day's events, UA-93, was scheduled to leave Newark at 0801.
The plane loaded its passengers at the gate and then taxied from the gate but did
not take off immediately. At Dulles airport 58 passengers and 6 crew members had been booked
on AA-77 which did not fly. Instead, a plane shuttled them (20-25 min.) to Newark.
Upon landing, passengers immediately switched planes on the tarmac to Flight 93
which took off without further delay at 0842. To claim that the 41 minute delay had
resulted from heavy traffic at that hour is simply absurd.
The launch of the small plane or missile that impacted the first NY tower was timed to occur
when UA-93 had completed its loading and received instructions to proceed to a
take-off runway. At 0846 the first NY tower was struck by that remotely controlled
explosive missile or small plane. At 0903 an
explosive drone airplane
launched from Stewart AFB, impacted the second tower. Pre-positioned cameras had been
installed for live video photography of this event. The video was fed into one control room,
which selected imagery that would be viewed by the public repeatedly, much of it simultaneously,
on all major television networks. This "news coverage" was combined with pre-recorded special
effects photography. President Bush had been permitted to review one such pre-recording. He
mentioned some days later having seen it before entering the Sarasota, FL schoolroom. The
totally unsupportable Arab hijacking narrative could never have been sold successfully to the
public without the cooperation of the nation's media that is owned and controlled by kinsmen of those
who arranged the day's other events.
There were several event-participants, unaware of the fate that awaited them that day, aboard two
so-called "United Airlines flights" that flew on 911, including pilots, who followed instructions.
Their function was to participate in, and manage on-board mock-hijacking scenario's in conjunction
with "terror drill" war-games being conducted at the highest level of government. Selected crew
members and passengers were instructed or coerced into effecting a few mock-hijacking scripted
cell-phone calls from temporary landing locations. Other spurious calls were simply invented by
the perpetrators, to be reported by their media.
Delta-1989, an unremarkable regularly scheduled commercial flight, had left Boston at 0825
bound for the west coast. This plane's pilot was ordered to land in Cleveland. It was
claimed that a bomb threat had been received. Enough personnel were on hand to totally
lockdown the entire Cleveland Hopkins airport. At 1000 hours all those within
the facility were ordered to leave the airport property. People were not allowed to
take their cars! They had to walk or get a ride at the highway. Busses were
not allowed to leave the airport. Persons were told to go home. Although the
source of the reported bomb threat should be easily traceable, it is not. The
day's events were planned meticulously. The Cleveland airport was shut solidly for a
reason. We think that we know the reason. No other reason comes to mind.
UA-93 landed in Cleveland at 1045. Flight time from Newark to Cleveland is one hour and
twenty-five minutes. UA-93 took around 40 minutes longer because it, as had UA-175, landed
at an interim airport. There, most of the flight's passengers transfered to another plane.
A handful of these, together with loyal event-participants, remained aboard UA-93. Parked
on the runway or tarmac, cell-phone calls were made, as required, in a terror-game mock
hijacking and takeover scenario. Spurious calls were again invented to be reported as news
by mainline media.
Since these calls were made between 0940 and 1000, flight-time to the interim air base must
have traversed somewhat more miles than midway between Newark and Cleveland. Drawing circles
around Newark and Cleveland, using a larger radius than midway between the cities for the Newark
circle, results in their intersecting at two points, a northern one close to or above Lake
Erie, and a southern one near Pittsburgh PA. Pittsburgh IAP Air Reserve Station is located
12.1 miles NW of Pittsburgh at the area's international airport.
Yeager Airport at Charleston WVA, has been mentioned in connection with the reported track
of AA-77, but it is too far from Newark, in my view, to serve as the interim phoning
landing site. The fake AA-77
Pentagon strike at 1003 was accomplished by a missile, fired from the west,
providing a phony AA-77 radar track picked up by radar as it approached Washington.
The non-commercial passenger jet to which most of UA-93's passengers transferred took off,
their plane having been rigged with high-yield low-radiation explosive weapons similar to those
used to pulverize New York's two WTC towers. Passengers and crew may have been reassured by the
information that a white military Warhog would provide protective escort for their plane as they
returned east. The pilot of the explosive laden plane may have been Charles Burlingame.
Over a rural area this plane was ordered shot down. Intercepted by a military fighter, the
engines of this substituted United Airlines marked plane were destroyed by heat-seeking missiles.
As it lost control and altitude, the high-tech on-board devices were remotely detonated at tree top
level by the white escort plane. The explosion created a white mushroom-shaped
cloud and shook houses more than
fifteen miles away. Some debris, blown sky high, ended up miles away and later reinforced
shoot-down theories. Regardless, the airplane and its passengers were not buried into the soft
earth at Shanksville. Human remains, a relatively small percentage of the total, were
distributed throughout 100 acres surrounding the "crash" site, most of the fragments in trees,
according to Wally Miller, the local coroner.
After the plane was pulverized at Shanksville, UA-93 was ordered to take off with its unfortunate
passengers. It landed at the Cleveland-Hopkins airport and taxied to a large building formerly
occupied by NASA remotely located at the airport.
No footnotes:
The above article was written specifically for those few who are thoroughly familiar with 911
research to date and with often contradictory evidence. It is also for persons who are now
seriously considering what really happened that terrible day. It is much easier to uncritically
accept the narrative promulgated by governmental officials, newspapers, and television. Take your
pick. Then consider the fact that there is no statute of limitations on the crime of first-degree murder.
|
